LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Maria Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 Dec 2011 03:18:21 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
This must be Part I to the research?
http://www.waba.org.my/pdf/BFR_Mar_09_Thorley.pdf

Also, I am wondering about something written in Part II. The Pretoria method of pasteurization is mentioned. When a donor is screened, why recommend/perform Pretoria when the research about this method has only adressed HIV (and a few bact.)? Same as with Flash Heating. Seems to me that if a mom wants to pasteurize for safety, then this method is not conclusive and Holder should be performed (which can be done at home with an electric jug).

I have looked long and hard into pasteurization and until research has clearly addressed other viruses directly with this method, we can only make assumptions that milk pasteurized with FH or P is safe. And again, if a donor is fully screened and properly handles the milk, there is no need to do this at all. 

Maria.

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2