Another letter on Guilt by K. Dettwyler PhD.
Dear Editor,
I was very chagrined to see USA Today promoting the "Rush Limbaugh" of
infant feeding circles, the book Bottlefeeding without Guilt, written by
Peggy Robin. The book is a careless hodgepodge of half-truths,
misleading or misinterpreted information, and outright lies. The author
has no credentials as an expert in infant feeding, and ignores or
misinterprets the scientific literature in example after example.
It amazes me that the public, and the media, take the perspective that
mothers should not feel guilty about choosing an infant feeding method
that puts their children at risk of many diseases and even death.
Bottle-fed babies have higher incidences of upper respiratory
infections, gastro-intestinal infections, sudden infant death syndrome,
ear infections, diabetes, Crohn's disease, childhood lymphoma,
rheumatoid arthritis, breast cancer (for the daughters, as adults),
orthodontic problems, and the list goes on and on and on. Advocates of
breastfeeding, like those who fight against cigarette use, must fight
against an extremely powerful, lucrative industry. The infant formula
industry rakes in over $22 million every day from the sale of a product
that is known to lead to life-long health problems.
Would USA today publish an article praising any of the following
hypothetical books: Cocaine Use During Pregnancy without Guilt, Driving
While Under the Influence, Without Guilt, Smoking in Your Baby's Face,
Without Guilt, or Not Putting Your Child in a Car Seat, Without Guilt? I
certainly hope not. Yet the issue of infant feeding, backed by the
powerful infant formula lobby, with millions of advertising dollars to
spend, is viewed as a "lifestyle choice" without health consequences. It
HAS consequences -- for the health of the children, and even for the
health of the mother. Women who bottle-feed have a much higher rate of
breast cancer than women who breastfeed. And those of us who work to
promote, protect, and support breastfeeding are labelled as cult members
or "breastfeeding nazis."
I urge you to check out either of the two newly published books that
adhere to standards of scientific accuracy for accurate information
about the health consequences of not breastfeeding. They are Money,
Milk, and Madness by Naomi Baumslag and Dia Michels published by Bergin
and Garvey, and Breastfeeding: Biocultural Perspectives, edited by
Patricia Stuart-Macadam and myself (Katherine A. Dettwyler), published
by Aldine de Gruyter. I think you will find them highly enlightening. I
will send along an excerpt from the conclusions of one of my own
chapters in the book, titled "Beauty and the Breast."
I suppose those of us who lobby for accurate information about the
adverse health consequences of bottle-feeding, and for a
breastfeeding-friendly society should take some satisfaction in the idea
that our efforts have been successful enough to elicit a backlash in the
form of this hastily thrown-together work by Ms. Robin. Unfortunately,
it is the children who will suffer in the long run, and parents who read
this book will once again have been denied the right to accurate
information on which to base their own decisions about how to best feed
their infants.
Prepared December 9, 1995.
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
