LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sarah Vaughan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 12 May 2012 07:02:04 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
On 11/05/2012 14:36, Elizabeth Brooks wrote:
> The notion that infant formula has somehow been tested, vetted, screened
> and designed within an inch of its infants-will-use-it-anyway life is
> simply not true.

Just to clarify, I was not at any point trying to claim that it was.  I 
am claiming that, since it*should* be, and that since part of that 
process should involve input from a specialist in infant nutritional 
needs, it would be ethical for such a specialist to work for a formula 
company in that capacity.


Best wishes,

Dr Sarah Vaughan
MBChB MRCGP

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2