LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
R LOCKYER <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 7 Jul 1996 17:43:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
-- [ From: Regina Lockyer * EMC.Ver #2.10P ] --


------- FORWARD, Original message follows -------

> Date: Sunday, 07-Jul-96 12:11 PM
>
> From: M Kirsch                 \ Internet:    ([log in to unmask])
> To:   Regina Lockyer           \ PRODIGY:     (EGNF87A)
>
> Subject: Lactivist: pesticides and breastmilk
>
> IN this morning's Phila. Inquirer (the major paper around here) there
was
> an article about children and pesticides.  In a bold caption it said
that
> pesticides were found everywhere--"even in mother's milk."  Then a
caption
> under a picture of a baby being fed solids was that a study showed
that
> formula contained less pesticides than cows' milk (this always
confuses me
> since formula is made from cows' milk).  Assuming that these facts
are
> true, the juxtaposition of the captions, plus the lack of comparison
> between pesticides in breastmilk, gives the impression that ABM is
better.
>  Anyway, does anyone have any stats they could give me before I write
a
> letter.
>
> I wanted to post to Lactnet, but all my mail was deleted this morning
> including instructions on how to post there.
>
> I meant to say above that there was no comparison between breastmilk
and
> ABM.
>
> Thanks in advance if anyone can help me.  My LLL materials didn't
have
> anything.
>
> Melissa K., mom to KEvin and Sean
>
>
>

------- FORWARD, End of original message -------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2