LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gonneke van Veldhuizen <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Aug 2001 06:48:33 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
In einer eMail vom 20-8-01 12:17:06 West-Europa (zomertijd) schreibt
[log in to unmask]:


> Jennifer Tow has posted that "stastically homebirth is safer".  Safer than
> what??  When mortality statistics are brought into the question, homebirth
> can bring with it a significantly increased risk (in Australia at least).
>

In The Netherlands homebirthing is still practiced as normal (60% initially
intending at conception, 30% actually homebirthing after close prenatal
screening by mostly private practicing and independant midwifes) and the
morbidity and mortality rates do not differ in a negative way to those in
other western countries and outcomes are in the higher ranks, I think only
Scandinavian countries are better.
One must ofcourse keep in mind that not only the place of birth but also the
quality of pre- and postnatal care has to be of the highest standards, which
definitely does not mean to be of the highest technical possibilities.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gonneke van Veldhuizen, IBCLC
MOM, LLLL, primary schoolteacher
Hiilensberg, Germany

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2