LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Brenda L. Phipps, BS, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Feb 1999 21:20:24 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I received some distrubing news today from my direct supervisor at my WIC
office.

I am an IBCLC for a WIC office.  Last week, my staff attended a one week
course seminar taught by two very well known women whose names I won't reveal.
They were told that if you are practising as an IBCLC and are not in a
licensed profession (i.e. a nurse working at a hospital) where your job
description states that you may touch women, that you are setting yourself up
for a potential lawsuit.  Evidently, there are quite a few cases pending right
now in which LCs are being sued for babies who have died or become ill after
mothers followed the advice of an IBCLC.

I stated that I do have liability insurance, but that was discussed at this
conference, and apparently it holds no water in a lawsuit if you are not a
licensed health professional in a job which requires touching in your job
description.  According to the teachers at this conference, IBCLC is simply a
piece of paper which states you passed an exam - it does not give you license
to "practise medicine" or provide hands on care.

I am sure that many of you can respond to this, and I look forward to the
discussion, as I am concerned.  My superivosr is seriously considering not
allowing me to perform consultations in our health department office any more.

Thanks,
Brenda Phipps, BS, IBCLC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2