LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
g raphael <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 6 Oct 2008 08:00:25 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (80 lines)
As usual, Morgan you say it so much more succinctly than i can manage.. and perhaps if feels like i'm beating a dead horse but I do think that this is important to discuss and challenge because it's so important to sustainable breastfeeding for many babies... but also for healthy babies in general/// 

This is a paradigm shift as they say... from parenting style and lifestyle choice to biological neccessity.. and that is why i don't worry about presenting to mother this information.... just like i wouldn't worry about presenting in an antenatal class the risks of formula milk.

I understand where Gina is coming from... I too live in the same culture  of the Type A Mom ... but again, why protect mothers from the truth?  i don't think i turn mothers off when i tell them that their baby wants them 24 hours day for homeostasis.... for many of them this is a relief to finally understand why their 6 week old baby cries every time they put them down... and once they understand the biological needs of their infant they're usually more than eager to learn about safe co-sleeping, slings to use etc... many of these moms will not be co-sleeping and baby-wearing in 6 months but only because they've usually learned to  respond to their baby in ways that are more conducive to their cultural values and lifestyle... and baby has become more biologically mature to adapt to our modern world.

i'd like to say that this will be all i say on the subject but i can't promise anything... :>

sincerely,
georgia



 

------------------------------

Date:    Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:00:27 +0100
From:    Morgan Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: A problem with AP

--=======AVGMAIL-48EA0BEB0000=======
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I often have to point out to people that attachment parenting is not a 
parenting style, but it is a way of describing a bond between the parent 
and child.  The use of the phrase 'attachment parenting' is highly 
counter-productive, I've found, as it means too many different things, 
to too many different people.  Some people end up thinking that 
cloth-diapering is part of an attached parenting philosophy!  Or no 
vaccinations, or home-schooling or ....

I think that's why many people are now discussing this territory, in 
terms of essential biology.  And of course, this now has it's own 
territory marked out, as you will find people discussing Biological 
Nurturing in the way they use 'attachment parenting' - a set of 
guidelines and suggestions that suggest a particular 'style' of parenting.

This often comes up in parenting groups, when people ask for the best 
'attachment parenting' books.  And they get confused when books without 
the words 'attachment parenting'; in their title, or even in the book at 
all, are suggested.

Attachment is an observation of success in parenting behaviour, not a 
prescription on how to parent.

If we're looking at biological needs, then we can certainly saying that 
attending to baby's essential biology, should result in very secure 
attachment.  So breastfeeding on demand and baby wearing, is high on the 
agenda, followed I'd probably say, by bed-sharing and then co-sleeping. 
   After that, it's usually about describing anti-attachment parenting 
behaviour, not in describing pro-attachment behaviour.  If you CIO, 
sleep train, keep baby at a distance physically, or allow it an endless 
stream of anonymous and ever changing care-givers... you are likely to 
disrupt attachment.  Disrupt attachment too much, you will probably 
cause the baby harm.  CIO, and you will cause the baby harm.

My cousin and I have diametrically opposed parenting styles.  We both 
have securely attached children.  Discuss.  :-)

Morgan Gallagher

(We both breastfed on demand and baby wore.  She bought me my Didymos.  
She sleep trained (but not CIO).  Go figure.)



             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome
      

ATOM RSS1 RSS2