LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:30:08 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
>At least for the initiation category, my understanding is that it 
>reflects even just one feed at the breast, or attempted feed.


Yes - no problem with that! That's the accepted definition of initiation.

It's the exclusive bf that I was wondering about.

Heather Welford Neil

NCT bfc, tutor, UK

>
>Sent from my phone
>
>
>>  On Oct 22, 2014, at 8:50 AM, heather <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>  A colleague has sent this:
>>
>>  http://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/pdf/2014breastfeedingreportcard.pdf
>>
>>  How robust is the collection of the data?
>>
>>  I ask, because the exclusive breastfeeding figures seem very high indeed.
>>
>>  We know US mothers have much shorter maternity leave than we do in 
>>Europe, and would find it hard to maintain excl breastfeeding.
>>
>>  Our (UK) initiation stats are about the same (latest survey 
>>indicates 81 per cent) but our exclusive rates are much *much* 
>>lower.
>>
>>  Any comments?
>>
>>  Heather Welford Neil
>>  NCT bfc, tutor, UK
>  > --
>

-- 

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2