LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kathleen G. Auerbach" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 10 Nov 1995 16:54:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
        I agree with Tom Hale. The study mentioned earlier is seriously
flawed.At least one individual has suggested to me that the authors also
had a particular "agenda" which influenced the cases used.  Setting that
aside for the moment, I have done a reasonably decent review of the
literature and the artilce in JAMA is the ONLY one I have found that
actually attempts to link silicone breast implants (leaking or otherwise)
to later health problems.  None of the other articles that have looked into
acute or chronic illness following their implantation has found any such
relationship.

I think we need to set aside this fear and get on with helping mothers to
breastfeed without this additional concern.




Def. of LC service: "We are all faced with a series of great opportunities
brilliantly disguised as impossible situations."
Kathleen G. Auerbach,PhD, IBCLC (Homewood, IL)- [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2