LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nancy H Jones <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 19 Dec 2000 00:53:41 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (102 lines)
FDA To Promote Drug Safety

By LAURAN NEERGAARD
.c The Associated Press


WASHINGTON (AP) - The room full of scientists let out a collective gasp at
Dr. Gideon Koren's tragic story: A woman picked up her baby and jumped in
front of a subway train. She became suicidal after quitting her
antidepression medicine - pills she gave up because someone told her,
falsely, that they could leach into breast milk and poison her child.

Every day women who are pregnant or breastfeeding wonder if a drug needed for
their own health might hurt their baby. Yet few drugs have been properly
studied for use during pregnancy - not just the big question of fetal safety,
but whether a pregnant woman's changing body requires a higher or lower dose.

And even when drugs are found safe, doctors or women may not know that and
abandon treatment, sometimes with dire results like the Toronto suicide.

The Food and Drug Administration is developing new rules that should help
pregnant women use at least some medicines more safely.

The plan is to require manufacturers to update drug labels annually with any
pregnancy safety data, such as independent research or patient case reports,
from anywhere in the world. Most companies avoid studying pregnant women and
typically just reveal whether animal studies show birth defects, nor do they
typically add to their products' labels safety discoveries by independent
researchers.

But that won't solve the underlying problem: ``There's ``a dearth of
research'' on drugs and pregnancy, laments FDA's Dr. Sandra Kweder, who this
month called together Koren, of Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children, and
other specialists to debate how to overcome that. ``If most pregnant women
knew how little information there is ... they would be greatly surprised.''

Pregnant Americans actually use a surprising number of drugs, yet hardly
anyone even tracks what happens to them or their babies.

``The part that troubles me the most is that I can't give patients definitive
information because it's not there,'' says West Virginia University clinical
pharmacologist Tim Tracy, who leads one of the few studies to track what
pregnant women use and thus hunt clues to risks.

Sixty percent of women used at least one prescription drug, not counting
prenatal vitamins or iron, at some point in pregnancy, say preliminary
results from Tracy's new obstetric database. They're often prescribed by
another doctor without telling the obstetrician - and include some, like
decongestants and an old antidepressant called amitriptyline, that
specialists say to avoid.

Almost everyone used some over-the-counter medications, including 25 percent
who used the painkiller ibuprofen, another pregnancy no-no because large
doses are linked to a heart defect. Also, 57 percent used herbal remedies,
which have even less pregnancy safety information than drugs.

Worry is understandable. Catastrophic drug-caused birth defects are rare, but
women remember notorious examples like thalidomide, which left babies with
flipper-like limbs in the 1960s.

But what too few doctors and women realize is that mothers' diseases
themselves can seriously hurt the fetus, say specialists in epilepsy,
depression, hypertension and asthma who routinely see women scared off vital
treatments - sometimes by misinformed obstetricians.

They describe women with artificial heart valves who died from shunning
necessary blood thinners, and women who quit epilepsy medicine only to suffer
seizures that triggered miscarriage.

Studies show inhaled corticosteroids are less risky than uncontrolled asthma,
which can kill the mother or impair fetal growth. Other studies show
serotonin-related antidepressants such as Prozac don't cause birth defects or
leach dangerously into nursing mothers' breast milk, while untreated
depression is a clear risk to the mother.

Some risks are very rare. The mood stabilizer lithium, for example, has a one
in 5,000 chance of a heart defect, a worthwhile gamble for some sick women,
Koren says.

Other drugs are risky only in the first trimester, when organs are forming.

And then there's the question of dose, which fluctuates with pregnant women's
hormonal, metabolism and other bodily changes. Take the antibiotic
amoxicillin, for urinary tract infections. Pregnant women need higher doses,
but too often doctors don't know that and prescribe a low dose thinking less
will reach the fetus - a mistake that doesn't cure the infection so women
need re-treatment, says FDA's Kweder.

``We have to figure out a way to get this kind of information to women so
they can make the best judgment'' on treatments, says Diana Zuckerman of the
National Center for Policy Research for Women & Families. ``You have to say,
'My God, why aren't we doing this already

EDITOR'S NOTE - Lauran Neergaard covers health and medical issues for The
Associated Press in Washington.

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2