Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 27 Aug 2000 22:30:17 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jack, on 18th August you wrote, " I agree that formula at 10 months is
completely unnecessary, even if the baby is not breastfeeding.... a baby of
10 months can drink plain cow's milk, goat's milk, camel milk, mare's milk,
and maybe even platypus milk, as long as he gets a variety of other foods in
adequate amounts and gets a decent amount of iron (which is pretty easy if
he eats meat).... It was only about 15 years ago, that the Canadian
Paediatric Society was saying cow's milk at 4 months. Then until about 8
years ago, cow's milk at 6 months. Now it's 9-12 months. Based on what,
all this? Formula company support for the Society. Sure, the *excuse* is
iron, but really, unlike in the US, there was no *big* issue of iron
deficiency in Canada in 6-12 months
old. You don't need formula to get iron."
Quite so. But I was wondering at what age non-breastfed babies can receive
straight animal milk without harm? I understood that there were concerns
about renal solute load and other excesses or deficiencies as well as iron
deficiency anaemia if milk is the baby's only source of nutrition.
BTW I think the development of special formulas for older babies was to get
around the Code which prohibits marketing of formula for younger babies.
Pamela Morrison IBCLC, Zimbabwe
[log in to unmask]
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|