LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Marianne Vanderveen-Kolkena <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 May 2008 16:57:48 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (59 lines)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Magda Sachs" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 4:21 PM
Subject: [LACTNET] WAS M. Pesonen research NOW 'widow of opportunity'

**Hello all,

> I am not disputing that there may be great advantages for children in
> receiving complementary foods by a certain age, however I really feel we
> need to procede with caution before creating slogans which could come back
> to haunt us and which could diminish the nutrition of more generations of
> babies.

**Well, Morgan... at least Magda has great trust in your ability to
influence a whole nation or world, for that matter, with your slogans!
hahaha

I want to join in with Teresa, who wonders if the allergic babies were
resisting food until older, as a sign of an allergy.
And if they were symptom-free until that age, that might also be worthwile,
as in those first months, they are still so vulnerable.
I admit that I did not read the whole research paper, but for a long time I
have been wondering about this complicated issue.
Just the other day, one of my girls (16) told about a classmate who had said
that he was allergic to breastmilk. I explained my daughter (who recently
wrote a paper for school about immunity and breastfeeding's role in it
(disagreeing with her friend's wording "Some mothers chose not to bf" as an
opening sentence... ;-)) and got a really good grade; I can ask *her* now if
I don't understand things... ;-)) that you cannot be allergic to breastmilk,
but that you are allergic to elements *in* the breastmilk that are not
species specific.
So I wonder, about these babies, exlusively bf for 6 or 9 months: are they
more allergic with introduction of solids after 6 months than after 9
months, or less?
The increase in atopic dermatitis: as compared to what...? To non-exclusive
breastfeeding, and if so, non-exclusive in what period, before or after six
or nine months...?
Oh, dear... I always get very mixed up. It really is beyond my imagination
that normal mammalian behaviour could infer more risks than something else.
Shouldn't be reading so much Lactnet-mail and get my formula brain washed...
And how to correct for all the confounding variables...? Pfff... research is
tricky business, imo...

Kindly,

Marianne Vanderveen, Netherlands

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2