LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim & Winnie Mading <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Jul 2001 21:40:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (43 lines)
I, too, was surprised at some of the exhibits at the recent ILCA
Conference.  Evenflo was listed as going to be there, but wasn't.  I
wonder if this was ILCA's or Evenflo's decision.  My biggest concern
would have been that they distribute a pump which I find at least 9
out of 10 moms who call with pumping concerns are using.  I can't
condemn it completely, however, because some moms having second or
further babies report having used it with no problems (perhaps they
are the ones with such a fantastic MER you could get plenty of milk
by running a rolling pin over the breast!).

Let's face it, we personally and professionally might wish all moms
who give baby anything other than directly from the breast would use
a cup or SNS or fingerfeeding.  On the other hand, some parents just
aren't comfortable with any of these no matter how much we extol
their virtues and point out the drawbacks of an artificial nipple!
When baby is not at breast, they will be using a bottle of some
sort.  Don't we, as professionals, owe it to them to help them find
one that will risk the least interference with direct
breastfeeding?  Knowing the advantages and disadvantages (or if you
prefer, the relative disadvantages) of various types will help us
help the parents to make the best choice for themselves in their
situation.  Seeing and learning about various options does not, IMO,
constitute endorsement.  (However, having such a company be
identified as a primary sponsor of a Conference could certainly be
seen as an endorsement.)

With this in mind, if a company can exhibit "sipping cups", why was
a company which is trying to develop a more "breast-like" feeding
method banned?  This is a company which, as far as I can see, is NOT
promoting their product as "just as good as" or "with this available
you don't really have to breastfeed".  Their intent appears to be
"if you are going to use some other container to deliver milk
(preferably yours) to baby, this offers the least difference".

Winnie Mading-glad I didn't need to take the exam for this year's
recert.

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2