LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Jan 2001 16:46:43 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (97 lines)
Nikki and Jan have referred to a study published in Birth last year that 
concluded that epidurals did not affect breastfeeding. The authors referred 
to and dismissed my work as insignificant. It's a good thing I have thick 
skin and an extensive collection of articles on the side effects of 
epidurals. My letter to the editor appears below. Like Linda, I have 
presented lectures for years that address the affects that birthing 
interventions have on breastfeeding. Some days the concrete blocks tied to 
our ankles threaten to sink breastfeeding in a sea of inadequate, incorrect, 
outdated, and conflicting information. The side effects and interventions 
that epidurals require are frightening. The biggest concrete block we have is 
the lack of good data on these issues. I bet if those of us on Lactnet who 
have access to hospital pateients and charts could come up with some dandy 
data on epidural rates, what drugs were used, how far dilated was the mother, 
how many times was the epidural topped off, how much IV fluid did the mother 
receive, how many minutes and hours of lactation consultant time were 
required to facilitate breastfeeding, how much was the baby supplemented, how 
much time did the mother spend with her baby, etc. Any researcher here 
willing to take on some organized data collection? The reaction to 
challenging epidurals is strikingly similar to the reaction to the topic of 
the hazards of infant formula. I have been writing and lecturing on this for 
years. The latest Ross data shows that exclusive breastfeeding rates in the 
US have been falling since 1995. Could this be related to not only the 
crushing commercial pressure on breastfeeding women to supplement but also 
the epidural baby unable to suckle at breast?

Marsha Walker, RN, IBCLC
Weston, MA
 
To  the Editor:
 
I wish to comment on the Halpern, et al study regarding labor analgesia and 
breastfeeding (Birth 1999; 26:83-88).This study looked at the use of epidural 
analgesia and the outcome measure of breastfeeding duration, concluding that 
epidurals had no effect on breastfeeding. However, the study did not measure 
the effect of epidural medications on the actual breastfeeding mechanics used 
by infants such as sucking or on infant state control – both of which are 
known to be affected by labor medications. A study by Riordan(1) examined the 
effects of labor pain relief medication use on neonatal sucking and 
breastfeeding duration.Infant feeding and sucking behaviors were measured 
with the Infant Breastfeeding Assessment Tool (IBFAT) which revealed 
significantly lower sucking scores in infants whose mothers had epidurals 
compared to those using no labor medications. As there was no unmedicated 
control group in the Halpern study, it is difficult to know if the 31% of 
mothers who visited the breastfeeding clinic and the 36% of mothers who had 
breastfeeding problems in the hospital (sore nipples, difficult latch) 
represent any difference from those women who had no labor medication.
 
The 72% of mothers breastfeeding exclusively at 6-8 weeks is an admirable 
achievement. However, these types of outcomes occur when the mother’s 
intention and motivation are so strong that they override the side effects of 
perinatal interventions and when breastfeeding support is intense and 
sustained. Mothers and infants may experience numerous side effects of 
epidural use that can affect breastfeeding which were not mentioned in the 
Halpern study. In a hospital that routinely separates mothers and babies, 
liberally uses pacifiers and bottles, gives away formula containing discharge 
packs, and offers little to no follow up, breastfeeding is often an early 
casualty. Epidurals in these hospitals (some with rates of 95% or higher) 
contribute yet one more barrier to successful breastfeeding.
 
I certainly agree that hospitals with decreased lactation success should 
reexamine their post delivery care policies. However, I feel that reducing 
epidural use will help eliminate a contributing factor to early breastfeeding 
problems. If a hospital is minimally staffed and using outdated protocols, 
how can it help babies to breastfeed whose sucking is depressed during the 
early postpartum period and whose mothers receive little feedback from their 
sleepy infant? The data that I presented in my review of labor medications 
and breastfeeding(2) was clear in that these drugs both reach the fetus and 
affect the neurobehavior of the newborn. While this was dismissed as being 
insignificant, it is certainly clinically relevant if an infant whose mother 
received an epidural experiences diminished early sucking ability.
 
Wouldn’t it make more sense to decrease the epidural rate, which would reduce 
the resulting number of early breastfeeding problems, alleviate the need for 
scarce intensive lactation support services, and simply avoid the problems to 
begin with? 
 
Thank you for your attention.
 
Sincerely,
 
 MarshaWalker, RN, IBCLC

References
 
1.     Riordan J, Gross A, Angeron J, Krumwiede B, Melin J. The effect of 
labor pain relief medication on neonatal suckling and breastfeeding duration. 
J Hum Lact 2000; 16:7-12
 
2.   Walker M. Do labor medications affect breastfeeding? J Hum Lact 
1997;13:131-137

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2