LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Morgan Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 3 Nov 2007 14:00:34 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Case 1: World Health Organisation reccomendation for breastmilk is for a 
minimum of two years, with appropriate solid foods to complement the 
breastfeeding - not the other way round.

http://www.who.int/child-adolescent-health/NUTRITION/complementary.htm

Case 2:  Effects of adverse brain development and physical stress from 
CIO in infant brain well documented.  Brain will be hardwired to respond 
to distress at a higer response level over time.  In newborns, CIO may 
result in stress levels so high, that baby reverts to in utero blood 
flow, and a hole in the heart opens up: in extreme cases this can lead 
to death if CIO carried on over time.   

Best source for this I've found is the _The Science of Parenting_ by 
Prof. Margot Sunderland, where she not only explains it all in easy to 
read bite sized chunks, but cites the scientific research impeccably.   
Launched as _The Science of Parenting_ initially in both the UL and USA, 
the book has been retitled in the UK as _What Every Parent Needs to 
Know_.  Book also covers brain development and bed-sharing, toddler 
tantrums and behaviour - and is invaluable up to adolescence.    I have 
no financial interest in this book, but huge respect for Prof. 
Sunderland's work.  Few experts can turn complex scientific data into 
readable and approachable info for all readers - this book manages it.

excellent online references:

http://www.naturalchild.org/guest/pinky_mckay.html

http://www.naturalchild.org/guest/lauren_lindsey_porter.html

http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/news/bodyandhealth/story.html?id=a1a74c84-c59d-414d-bbb7-3860fee988f1

http://www.askdrsears.com/html/10/handout2.asp  (Excellent scientific 
references)

Morgan Gallagher

[log in to unmask] wrote:
> Case 1:  Baby -- about a year old -- would rather nurse than eat solid  
> foods.  Eats some, but not a lot.  PHCP says mom is to stop  breastfeeding so child 
> will eat solids.  ARGGGHHHHHH.  We all know the  correct responses to that, 
> why that is a DUMB idea, etc etc.  Anyone have  any literature to back us up?
>  
> Case 2:  (and literally thousands of cases like it):  Baby  doesn't *need* to 
> nurse after (pick a time:  10 pounds, 3 months, 4 months  -- whatever.  "Bad 
> habit.  Will always want to eat at night...."   Answer is to let baby cry it 
> out at bedtime, middle of the night, naptime.   Again, need specific 
> professional (not parenting) literature to say that might  be a bad idea.
>  

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2