LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Laurie Wheeler, RNC, MN, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 Apr 1997 23:46:21 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
In a message dated 97-04-29 09:55:41 EDT, you write:
<<
 Any suggestions for follow up with this case? My first  inclination is to
defend myself with a fully referenced letter on why I felt this baby was in
imminent danger and explaining LLLI does NOT generally get this involved in a
case >>
Anne,
I would send a brief note thanking him for contacting you with the outcome.
 I would BRIEFLY reiterate that based on the info you had of brick dust, no
stools, low urine, whatever, and since the mother did seem somewhat
overwhelmed and inconsistent with reports, you felt it was prudent to persist
with your followups and calls to md. You might even say something like
although you are there to always help families achieve their own bf goals,
your rule no. 1 has always been FEED THE BABY.
Then he'll know from where your zealousness really came.
Laurie Wheeler, RNC, MN, IBCLC
Violet LA

ATOM RSS1 RSS2