LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Janice Reynolds <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Apr 2006 09:10:52 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (49 lines)
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2006-03/bmj-cid031606.php

Commercial interests driving standards for formula milk

Editorial: Standards for infant milk formula; BMJ Volume 332, pp 621-622

Commercial interests may be the strongest driver of what goes into formula milk, warn child health experts in this week's BMJ. Professors Berthold Koletzko and Raanan Shamir describe a meeting in Bonn, Germany in November 2005 to revise the standard on infant formula. The meeting involved government delegations, non-governmental organizations, and other groups with commercial interests in infant formula. 

Infant formula must meet very high quality standards. The Codex Alimentarius Commission, part of both the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations and the World Health Organisation, develops standards and guidelines on food to protect consumers' health and to ensure fair trade practices globally. 

Three scientific reviews all agree that the safe level of infant formula protein should be based on a recognised nitrogen conversion factor. In Bonn, however, the International Dairy Federation demanded that the proportion of protein in formula derived from cows' milk should be based on a larger nitrogen conversion factor. 

Even though no scientific arguments were put forward to justify the federation's request, and it would falsely indicate that cow's milk protein is superior to human milk protein, it got support from several member states with strong dairy industries. While the industry argues that using the lower nitrogen conversion factor would lead to a loss of some €80m (£55m; $96m) for the dairy industry in Europe alone, this is clearly not the case if the appropriate factor is applied to infant feeding products. 

Another controversial issue was the approach to setting maximum values for nutrients. The scientific expert report recommended that the contents of water soluble vitamins in infant formulas should not exceed five times the minimum level unless there are data to justify other decisions. 

But, contrary to this strong scientific advice, some member states requested that the maximum values should be established only for levels of nutrients with documented adverse effects in infants, while in all other cases only interim upper values should be established which would not be binding for manufacturers. 

Moreover, the US delegation requested that both maximum values and guidance values should not be lower than values used for formulas already on the market, even if such levels have not been subjected to systematic evaluation of their biological effects and safety. The worldwide medical community might question the basis of these decisions and might rise to reject such commercial pressures, suggest the authors. 

Doctors should choose and recommend only those infant formulas with compositions based on current scientific knowledge and on the nutritional requirements of infants, they conclude. 

(that's the full press release)

The BMJ editorial:

http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/extract/332/7542/621?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&andorexactfulltext=and&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=0&sortspec=relevance&volume=332&firstpage=621&resourcetype=HWCIT

Editorial
Standards for infant formula milk 
Commercial interests may be the strongest driver of what goes into formula milk 

BMJ  2006;332:621-622 (18 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7542.621

(see link above for full article, which requires a subscription)

Janice Reynolds
             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2