LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 May 2005 07:34:23 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (137 lines)
Libby has asked where to send samples of Code violations. All Code  
violations should be sent to me at NABA REAL, 254 Conant Rd, Weston, MA 02493.  This is 
very important as NABA REAL is conducting a Code Monitoring workshop  this 
July for updating the status of the Code in the US.
 
I also thought many of you would be interested in the letter below that  
Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney is sending to all members of the US House of  
Representatives regarding the study done by the Independent Women's Forum  and the 
IWF's push to defeat the WHA resolution on breastfeeding and  formula safety. I 
had the privilege of collaborating with Rep Maloney's staff in  providing 
accurate information and  language to counter some of the  egregious statements 
made in the IWFs document. I hope the letter comes through  OK. If it does not, 
e-mail me and I will re-send a clean copy. You can also  distribute this 
letter to whomever you wish and ask your own Member of the House  of 
Representatives to sign on to this important letter. I am hoping this helps  the WHA 
resolution which if accepted becomes part of the Code.
 
Marsha Walker, RN, IBCLC
Weston, MA


May 25, 2005 
Support Breastfeeding  World-Wide 
Sign Letter to HHS Secretary  in Support of WHO Resolution 
Dear Colleague,  
Recently many of us received a letter from the  Independent Women's Forum in 
opposition to a resolution addressing infant and  young nutrition being 
discussed by the World Health Assembly - the governing  body of the World Health 
Organization. 
While  this resolution seeks to promote and support breastfeeding throughout 
the  world,  the Independent Women's Forum has decided to characterize it as  
"anti-women, anti-mother and anti-development" and they claim these actions 
are  "setting women back decades in the workplace."  They ask Members of  
Congress to urge our government to lead the opposition to this  resolution. 
To  bolster these claims, they point to a study authored by Dr. Scott  
Gottlieb.  I have shared this study with a number of experts within the  
breastfeeding community and they have raised concerns about the  study. 
I  invite you to join me in sending the attached letter to Health and Human  
Services Secretary Mike Leavitt.  This letter is in support of the  resolution 
and raises several issues with Dr. Gottlieb's study. 
If  you would like to co-sign the letter or if you have any questions, please 
do not  hesitate to contact Edward Mills of my staff at 5-7944 or 
[log in to unmask] <_mailto:[log in to unmask] 
(mailto:[log in to unmask]) >. 


Sincerely,  

CAROLYN B. MALONEY  
Member  of Congress  



The Honorable Michael O. Leavitt 
Secretary 
Department of Health and Human Services       
200 Independence Ave. S.W. 
Washington, D.C. 20201  
Dear Secretary Leavitt:  
We  are writing to express our support for a resolution addressing infant and 
young  child nutrition being discussed in Geneva, Switzerland by the World 
Health  Assembly - the governing body of the World Health Organization (WHO).  

This resolution, EB115.R12, is designed to continue  protecting, promoting 
and supporting breastfeeding.  As I am sure you are  aware, breastfeeding has 
been proven to have numerous health benefits for both  the mother and the child. 
 Specifically: 
    *   Studies have shown that exclusive breastfeeding for the  first 6 
months of life decreases rates of type I and type II diabetes in  children and 
adults, just as it reduces the incidence of childhood obesity -  conditions that 
have reached epidemic proportions in the US 
    *   The US health care system spends between $4-7 billion  on diseases 
and conditions that are preventable by breastfeeding and the use  of human milk. 
NIH data shows that postneonatal death rates are increased for  infants not 
breastfed 
    *   Employers enjoy lower absenteeism, better production,  improved 
employee retention, and reduced health claims when their  breastfeeding mothers are 
provided with time and space to pump their milk; the  return on investment 
can be more than $3 to $1  

Additionally, it is our understanding that you have  been made aware of a 
study that was commissioned by the Independent Women's  Forum (IWF).  The author 
of this study is Dr. Scott Gottlieb.  While  we are pleased that the study 
repeatedly states that "scientific evidence  continues to support breastfeeding 
as the primary source of newborn nutrition,  " we wanted to express our 
concerns about other parts of this study that  appear to portray a much bleaker 
reality of breastfeeding than is the  norm.  We are concerned about a number of 
claims made by the study.   Specifically it:  
    *   Misinterprets the International Code of  Marketing of Breast Milk 
Substitutes by falsely claiming it seeks to ban  access to formula.  This code in 
no way seeks to ban formula, it only  pertains to the marketing of formula. 
    *   Assumes that the use of infant formula is  completely safe.  In 
actuality, powdered infant formula is not a  sterile product and has been 
associated with outbreaks of sepsis,  meningitis, and necrotizing enterocolitis in both 
premature and full term  infants in developing and developed countries 
worldwide. Recognizing this,  the Food and Drug Administration issued a letter to 
health professionals  in 2002, recommending that powdered infant formulas not be 
used in  neonatal intensive care units 
    *   Appears to overstate the occurrence of  certain medical conditions 
and their effect on preventing  breastfeeding.  It is our understanding that 
conditions such as  nipple bleb are far less common and far less of a barrier to 
breastfeeding  than the study would suggest. 
    *   Fails to address recent studies regarding  the benefit of 
breastfeeding even if the mother is HIV positive.  The  study is quick to list the risks 
associated with a mother with HIV/AIDS  breastfeeding her child, but it fails 
to mention any of the recent studies  that have shown that HIV positive 
mothers are actually at less risk for  mother-to-child transmission when the infant 
is breastfed exclusively for  3 months. 


Finally, it appears that one of the Independent Women's  Forum's concerns 
regards employed mothers.  With more than 50% of mothers  with children under the 
age of one in the U.S. workforce, we recognize this as  a real concern.  That 
is why we support the Breastfeeding Promotion Act,  HR 2122, introduced by 
Congresswoman Carolyn B. Maloney.  The aim of this  legislation is to remove the 
barriers women face when they choose to continue  to breastfeed and return to 
work.  We should be doing everything to  support the right of women to 
breastfeed when they choose to do so, rather  than focus our energies on defeating 
the WHO proposal that promotes  breastfeeding. 

Sincerely, 

CAROLYN B.  MALONEY                XXXXXXXXXXX 
Member of  Congress                                       Member of Congress 

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2