LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andrea Eastman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Jun 1997 19:57:49 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
In a message dated 97-06-18 16:36:52 EDT, you write:

<< positive breastfeeding language in the medical literature

 Hooray!  It is finally happening:  data is being reported NOT as a
 "benefit of breastfeeding" but as an "increased morbidity from
 bottle-feeding."  I just finished reading the full text of Scariati's June
 Pediatrics article, and I quote:  "When compared with exclusively
 breastfed infants, infants who received formula only had an 80% increase
 in their risk of developing diarrhea and a 70% increase in their risk of
 developing an ear infection."

 Ginna Wall, MN, IBCLC, Lactation Services Coordinator
 University of Washington Medical Center, Mailbox 356153 >>
********************

I think she meant to write "infants who received formula-only", meaning the
group of infants ONLY received formula.

Andrea Eastman, MA, CCE, LLLL, Granville, Ohio

ATOM RSS1 RSS2