LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jim & Winnie Mading <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Mar 2001 08:34:09 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Jon,
I think this thought has been posted before, but I really find it
helpful in explaining the truth about the relationship of different
formulas to breastmilk.

Yes, the addition of (whatever new discovery) does make that formula
closer to breastmilk....but only to the same extent that Davenport
is closer to Honolulu than Bettendorf is. (For those not familiar
with Iowa geography, you might say..like Newark is closer than New
York City or whatever 2 cities close together are familiar to your
hearer.)
I think this comparison really points out that even when they do add
something "new" to formula it is still so far from
breastmilk/breastfeeding that it in no way negates the importance of
breastfeeding.
  To play with the analogy even further-even if they are able to
keep inching the formula closer, there is still the "ocean" to
cross.  That ocean is all the aspects of breastfeeding like physical
contact etc. that will never be reproduced.  (See Diane Weissinger's
"It's Not About the Milk".

Winnie Mading RNC, IBCLC, MOM

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2