LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Duncan Broadfoot <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 2 May 1996 03:11:29 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Yes in Norway it is the Government who pays I understand.  The Scandinavian
countries have positive attitudes to families, manifested by lengthy maternity
leaves (among other things, no doubt!).  Actions speak louder than words.

For the past 15 years or so we in the UK have been encouraged to reject the idea
of society, and look after number one.  Many people now believe we are seeing
the consequences, with an alienated portion of society more evident than I can
remember.

Does society accept any responsibility for its members?  I think very few would
be brave enough to say NO.  The question is how much to accept.  Norway quite
possibly finds that it makes economic sense to give financial support to
families in the early years.  Is it not possible that reduced social and
healthcare costs follow?  Certainly there are cost savings to be made from
increased breastfeeding rates.  I bet Norway doesn't have many babies
hospitalised with gastro-intestinal illness!

I personally would be happy to pay more taxes to allow mothers a genuine choice,
and give more babies the chance of the best start in life.  Rather that than
paying later for hospitalisation, social work or drug rehabilitation.

Mary Broadfoot, bolshie in Paisley, Scotland

[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2