LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Melissa V. Kirsch" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Jun 1998 07:03:56 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Debi brings up an interesting point, that I as a non-LC, but another
professional, think is very important. If you want to be a professional,
then there must be an oversight/disciplinary board.  Doctors, lawyers,
etc.  are subject to them.  Additionally, many professions actively
pursue those who are unlicensed.  For example, the person giving legal
advice *for money*  will be subject to sanctions and even criminal
charges.  I'm not saying this should be done regarding LCs (although I
wish a local non-certified LC couldn't practice), but it is something to
think about esp. if board-certified LCs become subject to disciplinary
boards and other LCs are not.

The negative side of this though  is whether people really want to push
people like Jay and Anne out, who have helped countless mothers, and
really know about BF, whereas there are board-certified LCs who don't
know half as much.  I'll leave that to those who are members of the
profession to debate.

Melissa Kirsch, JD, LLLL, speaking in the JD capacity.

_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2