LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"David A. Green" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 16 Dec 1998 14:42:09 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
In a message dated 12/16/98 9:59:00 AM Central Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< The babies were *not* breastfeeding.  They were only pretending
 to breastfeed. >>

Don't blame the babies, it was not their fault, eh?  Perhaps the moms were
"pretending" to breastfed.  Also, I was not faulting breast milk per se
regarding kernicterus but you can see how certain health care providers might
make the "false" connection between the two especially when we have journal
articles about breastfed babies being slower to respond to phototherapy.  Is
there some conspiracy going on here?  <g>
Andrew MD FAAP
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2