LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jack Newman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Dec 1996 16:28:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
There is absolutely no reason for the mother and baby to be separated.
This is yet another example of "if in doubt stop breastfeeding" with the
implied message "breastfeeding is a dangerous business".  The
conservative approach (that is, safest for mothers and babies) is "if in
doubt continue breastfeeding".

        Breastfeeding has never been shown to be a method of transmission of
Beta Strep from mother to baby.  On the contrary, the immune factors in
the milk will give the baby the edge in fighting off transmission.  But
since the babies are being treated anyway with antibiotics, there seems
to be absolutely no rational for this separation of 12 to 24 hours.
(Except that physicians like to exert control).  That midwives would buy
into this nonsense should make us reconsider the wisdom of bringing
midwives into the establishment.  Does anyone seriously believe that
babies are more likely to get Beta Strep from breastfeeding than from
travelling through the vagina?

Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2