LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kathy Dettwyler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 14 Feb 1997 20:48:08 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Kathleen G. Auerbach" wrote:
I would have far less difficulty with their tactics if they limited their
comparisons to other formulas, rather than saying that their concoction is
the closest thing to mother's milk.  None can claim this.  When they stop
trying to sell breastfeeidng mothers, I will be more sanguine about their
marketing copy.

I'd add: when they stop portraying breastfeeding as something one does only
with a newborn, only in your negligee, only in your bedroom, and when the
print photos that show a mom breastfeeding show her left hand with wedding
ring showing.  Currently, only the bottle-feeding moms have a wedding ring
showing, while the same woman when breastfeeding always has her left hand
obscured.  Coincidence, I don't THINK so.  And her smile is always bigger
and she making direct eye-to-eye contact in the bottle-feeding pictures.

If you think the ads directed to the public are awful, you should see the
ones directed to physicians......

I'd be happy to describe one I have, if anyone is interested!


Katherine A. Dettwyler, Ph.D.
Texas A&M University

ATOM RSS1 RSS2