Lisa writes:
"of the herbs we are familiar with L3 type of
ratings is because there is little to no data. His book is scientifically
based on research, evidence, and reported experience, all of which are
scarce when it comes to herbs. In keeping with his reporting standards, he
cannot make definitive statements that he cannot support. Thus, the
"moderately safe" rating. It is not a statement of negativity per se, but
rather a reflection of a lack of western science type of data."

I understand this, Lisa, but some of the drugs considered to be safe have few studies as well. I believe far fewwer drugs are safe than are presented as so, based upon his book (which I do use all of the time, b/c it is the best withihn the allopathic paradigm). My issue is that I do not think his book should be a source used by HCPs for herbal information.  I do not ask allopathic providers about their use of herbs--I ask naturopaths and herbalists. IMO, the methodology used to assess western drugs is sorely lacking and allows many dangerous products on the market (AIM is a good example). I have no desire to see herbs evaluated in the same way. I would rather see a holistic evaluation applied to all substances.
Jennifer Tow, IBCLC, CT, USA

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html