LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kathleen Bruce <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 1 Dec 1997 07:02:48 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Good morning. I have to admit that while away last weekend (with my dinosaur
laptop that takes sooo long to download) I was nomail.  However, I see that
there is a discussion of the merits of the acronym SIN. I hope we will not
devote too much space to this.  I personally think that it is a blame-filled
acronym, and there is enough blame in the world at this point.  I don't
think that SIN is an appropriate acronym for artificial baby milk, and I
don't even think I can bear to read about it much. SIgh.

Kathleen
Kathleen B. Bruce, BSN, IBCLC co-owner Lactnet,TLC, Indep. Consultant
http://together.net/~kbruce/kbbhome.html
LACTNET Archives http://library.ummed.edu/lsv/archives/lactnet.html
LACTNET WWW http://www.telcomplus.net/~kga/lactation.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2