LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Monique E. Jones" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:10:51 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (61 lines)
Laura mentions a 1992 LEAVEN article "Leaders and Lactation Consultants"
which references an even older 1990 LEAVEN article "Guidelines for Active
Leaders Who Also Work As Paid Lactation Consultants",  This 1990 article
(and anything based on it) is out of date.  The most current PSR (policy
and standing rules) from LLLI discuss guidelines for Leaders who are
lactation consultants: this is the "Code of Ethics: Leaders with Personal,
Professional, or Commercial Interests" which states

"Some LLL Leaders may be engaged in paid professions and businesses which
offer products or services of value to mothers. LLL Leaders shall make all
efforts to separate their roles as LLL Leaders from these paid professions.
An LLL Leader who is also a paid professional or businesswoman shall offer
choices to mothers, in addition to her own products or services, when
appropriate and possible."

So a Leader may certainly let a mother know she is also an IBCLC -- as long
as she also lets a mother know about her IBCLC  colleagues also available
locally.  The key is to offer choices.

We can take our volunteer and professional hats on and off but  we can't
wear both at once.  If it becomes clear during a volunteer helping
situation that the expertise of a professional IBCLC is called for, and we
have that expertise, it is appropriate to use it -- but then the mother
becomes a CLIENT and all our professional responsibilities as an IBCLC
(including consent, assessment, history, documentation, reporting) are
called for.   An IBCLC could decide to give her services for free to a
mother she meets via a volunteer situation -- but that mother still
deserves the same service a paying client would receive & our professional
responsibility requires it.  Do I have that right, Liz?

(I do not speak in any official capacity for LLLI, I hasten to add.  It's a
topic I find interesting and tend to talk about often.  If my information
is not up to date, someone let me know!)

Monique Jones
IBCLC & LLLL
www.facebook.com/MoonflowerLC  | www.moonflowerlactation.com |
[log in to unmask] | @moonflowerlc

Date:    Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:04:21 -0500
> From:    Laura Spitzfaden <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Re: Short tongue (and) LLLL vs IBCLC scope of practice and
> insurance
>
> Bow I'm really confused.  I am going by LLL when I am a LLLL.
>
> http://www.llli.org/llleaderweb/lv/lvsepoct92p75.html
>
>

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2