LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Morgan Gallagher <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Feb 2009 20:21:58 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
Hi Teresa,

I'm replying on-list, as this info may be important to others.

I'm chair of an advocacy organisation called "Nursing Matters" and we 
advocate on behalf of breastfed babies and children.

In the past, in this situation, we've provided an advocacy statement on 
behalf of a child, pointing out the needs of that child, and the impact 
on cessation of breastfeeding etc would have on that child.  We append 
the references to World Health Organisation, Unicef and country local 
laws.  We also append a letter of support by a breastfeeding expert in 
the field.  We give the advocacy statement to the mother, to pass on to 
lawyers, social workers etc.  We also include independent, local, 
breastfeeding support numbers (usually clearing it with the local people 
in advance) so that lawyers and judges can contact them on their own remit.

I'll send you an anonymous copy of one such advocacy statement, 
off-list, in a moment.

In this incidence, I'd suggest creating an advocacy document in the name 
of this child.

"Child XXX is a breastfeeding infant.  Under the World Health 
Organisation and Unicef guidelines, in which a mother and child are 
recommended to breast feed for as long as both mutually desire, this 
child is receiving the gold standard of health protection by the 
mother.  It is important to recognise that breastfeeding is an activity 
that the child undertakes, not the mother and this is recognised by the 
WHO stance that it is a mutual relationship...." etc.

I'd the provide reference to the normative function on breastfeeding an 
older child, such as Kathy Dettwyler's work etc.  Back it all up with 
references to health and the WHO.

Then move on to the defence:

"Breastfeeding is providing Child XXXX with many excellent health 
benefits.  (Reference) If a decision is made to force weaning upon Child 
XXX, there are immediate risks in increased health, particularly in 
terms of emotional security and health.  (reference).  You will also 
raise health risks in the mother, in particular raising her risk of 
breast cancer. (reference)."

We ask that you consider Child XXXX's needs and health, is discussing 
the custody and care arrangements of Child XXX.  Child XXX continues to 
breastfeed, and thus fulfil the gold standard for health protection, 
under his/hers own volition, and we request that Child XXX's needs are 
listened to, and respected, by all concerned."

You get my drift.  If you can, highlight that if they act against the 
child, they may get in trouble themselves, this is tricky: see below.

Very useful is "This research has been done by such and such a Very Big 
Person In Breastfeeding Research, and they are happy to discuss this 
with you on (telephone number/email.)"  Obviously, you pre-clear this.  
Having a letter from them, personalised to that child, is VERY USEFUL 
INDEED.  :-)

Always use the child's first name, speak for that child's needs, only 
refer to the mother in passing.  Speak for the child.

We'd be happy to put together such a statement for you, but you need to 
pay attention to the local legal situation.  You need to get a sense of 
who and what the local are judges will listen to.  Some will use a 
statement from outside the county, never mind the country, as toilet 
paper.  :-)  So target for your area - who will the best person be, for 
them to listen too?  On one, we went straight to the WHO themselves, and 
got a statement on that particular child's weight gain, from the WHO 
weight charts office.  In the UK, we are greatly aided by the European 
Court of Human Rights on this, as the right to breastfeed etc, can be 
quoted from a judgement on record in the England & Wales courts.  
Lawyers back off when they see the ruling.  But it's not so clear cut 
outside Europe.

Hope this helps.  :-)

Morgan Gallagher

www.nursingmatters.org.uk


Teresa McCullen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just had a call from a friend (and former breastfeeding Mom), who is a guardian ad litem locally. She needs info to take to an emergency custody hearing (Wed), to counter charges that the child (4 yo) is being subjected to emotional incest by the mother. Dad is currently the (out of town) custodial parent. I would appreciate hearing from anyone with recent experience in this area of practice. Please contact me privately for additional information.
>
>   

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome



No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.0.233 / Virus Database: 270.10.19/1941 - Release Date: 02/09/09 06:50:00              *********************************************** Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html To reach list owners: [log in to unmask] Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask] COMMANDS: 1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail 2. To start it again: set lactnet mail 3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet 4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2