Dear all:

I read the Health-E Learning article and I'm wondering if those authors actually read the full 
references that they included or merely read some part of the abstract.  Most of the original 
works do not support the first part of their chart where they make a line from mothers 
intake of sugar to lactose.  There is tons of research to refute that particular assumption. 
Having read many of the more reputable sources on their list and not the ones that are 
from more obscure sources, I came away from the readings developing very different 
conclusions. I'd have to read the originals to pick them apart and figure out why they used 
these article in such a way as to shore up a really wild assumption and sugar intake of the 
mother influences the lactose content of the milk.

I'd say that they are going way out on a limb from reading abstracts and summaries not the 
original full scale articles and not challenging their own assumptions.  

Best, Susan

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome