LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Mar 2002 18:53:02 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
In a message dated 3/3/2 5:07:25 PM, [log in to unmask] writes:

<< I know a lot of this was discussed several years ago on LN, but I don't
remember that "non-human" was one of the terms in the discussion.
Does anyone else agree that that would add a powerful differentiation to
the terminology, and can anyone think of a shorter way to get it in a
title with "artificial"? >>

Jean, how about:
Non-Human, Bovine Based, Artificially Manufactured Infant Milk: NHBBAMIM
oops, does not meet the "shorter" criteria

how about, describing not what is isn't, but *what it is*:
Dairy Accessed Milk: DAM
Cow Udder Secretions: CUS
Dairy Udder Milk: DUM
Bovine Udder Milk: BUM

oops, too judgmental?

glad this is just between our little group here on LN

Debbie Tobin
RN BSN IBCLC LCCE
Springfield, Virginia USA
In the Fairfax County suburbs outside the Washington DC beltway
[log in to unmask]

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2