LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Judy Ritchie <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:33:01 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (76 lines)
Newspaper is on breastfeeding mothers/babies side.  Good editorial.

Judy Ritchie

 

http://www.sltrib.com/ci_9018057

 

Texas abuse: Nursing mothers should be with little ones

Tribune Editorial

Article Last Updated: 04/22/2008 06:46:57 PM MDT

 

It will take many months, maybe even years, to determine whether the actions
by Texas authorities in removing 437 children from their homes in a compound
of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints was
justified. 

    But Texas District Judge Barbara Walther's order that nursing mothers
not be allowed to breastfeed their babies and toddlers - 77 under age 2 at
last count - while in state custody seems unwarranted, even heartless. 

    We cannot see how these infants and toddlers, even if their parents'
polygamous lifestyle puts female children at risk of sexual abuse when
they're older, as the state claims, could be endangered simply by
breastfeeding. 

    In fact, the judge's reasoning on this point seems ludicrous.
Breastfeeding is certainly not one of the polygamous practices that are
being challenged as systemically abusive. And it's not likely that the
mothers could plot with these small children to hinder the state's case in
some way as they are nursing. 

    Worse, the judge's order is not in the interest of these children's
physical and mental health. And it's not something that the mothers can
resume if the children are, eventually, returned to them. In other words,
the court would be permanently depriving these children of the best
nutrition available, even if the state fails to prove its case against their
parents. 

    And breastfeeding is more than good nutrition. The bond that forms when
a child is fed at a mother's breast has been found to be important to its
emotional good health. 

    Nevertheless, the state Child Protective Services plans to send 95
mothers home who are now caring for their children under age 5 under state
supervision. 

    We believe that is unconscionable. 

    If, as one Texas CPS official said, "Our main thing is to protect
children from abuse and neglect," these tiny children should be allowed the
benefits of breastfeeding. To deprive them of those benefits, when so much
that is familiar has been taken from them, is simply abuse by another name. 

 

 


             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2