LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 2 Jan 2006 10:25:15 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (79 lines)
 
 
Phyllis asks, in response to my  post about the "olden" days:
 
<<Do we know what  their experience was with jaundice and hypoglycemia and
weight loss at that  time?>>


 
 
No, we really don't.  Prior  to the advent of bililights (circa late 60's), 
no one worried too much about  jaundice that wasn't caused by Rh 
incompatibility.  The only method of  treating it was sunlight and exchange transfusion.  My 
sister, born in 1957  (ABO incompatibility) was sent home nicknamed "Little 
Buttercup."  She's  the most intelligent of the four of us.  I did my OB 
rotation in 1966, and  I don't remember concerns about weight loss, jaundice, or 
hypoglycemia that  didn't result in symptoms.  If there were symptoms, the baby 
was  treated.  If not, he wasn't.  And of course, we didn't have instant  adult 
glucometers then, so it meant a lab draw.....And they were treated with  
glucose water, not formula at that point in time.
 
Of course, not very many women  were breastfeeding, so that may have been 
part of the lack of concern.   Just stuff the babies with a bit more formula.  
But the ones that were  nursing weren't always topped off.  
 
Just seems to me that people  didn't get nearly as concerned about those 
"diseases" back then.  
 
Good?  Bad?  I don't  know.  
 
I for one am certainly glad for  the advent of RhoGam -- being Rh negative 
with an Rh positive husband and three  Rh positive children.  But I refused, 
with Timothy, to get a RhoGam  injection at 28 weeks of pregnancy (which they 
were doing 21 years ago, but not  27 years ago) just because it was the new thing 
to do.  If I had been  kicked in the abdomen or fallen down the stairs or had 
some bleeding that might  have indicated a need, I would have done it.  I see 
the same thing with  doing so many glucometers -- we have the technology, so 
we use it -- thus  creating more of a need, and more of an incidence of 
hypoglycemia that probably  isn't.  
 
And are we treating jaundice too  quickly?  There is no denying kernicterus 
is a problem -- but you didn't  used to be able to diagnose it until the baby 
was dead -- yellow staining of the  brain tissue -- but now -- ???
 
OTOH, women didn't leave the  hospital for at least 4 to 7 days back then.  
Perhaps we were more able to  monitor babies and see if there were problems 
before they were sent home.  
 




(\__/)
(='.'=)
(")_(") Jan Barger, RN, MA,  IBCLC

_Lactation Education  Consultants_ 
(http://www.lactationeducationconsultants.com/)  
_My Mother of the Bride  Blog_ (http://www.motherofbridebyjan.blogspot.com/)  
_Torrey's  Wedding Webpage_ 
(http://weddings.theknot.com/pwp/view/co_main.aspx?coupleid=3216252686617334)  






             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2