LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Nancy Willilams MA, IBCLC, CCE" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 30 Oct 1995 22:51:46 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
In a message dated 95-10-30 18:55:55 EST, you write:

>How do we request that the standards for longterm effects include infant
>feeding outcomes?  The baby who recovers all his marbles on Day 2, but for
>whom breastfeeding terminates because of problems on Day 1, has most
>certainly suffered an "adverse long term effect" - one that researchers
>should be expected to address in their studies

Oh, how I've longed for someone to ask that question besides me!  I'm
convinced that we (brfeeding fanatics) are the only ones who are the
slightest bit interested, so it may be up to us to accomplish a good study.
 I am most definitely *not* a researcher, so one of you needs to do this <g>

Do we know anything for sure about the new ITN that is all the rage for
labor-meds here?  Is it the same as an epidural, in terms of brfding
problems?  Excuse my ignorance.  The docs here are insisting that it couldn't
be because "none of it gets to the baby".
Nancy

ATOM RSS1 RSS2