LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jan Barger RN, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 27 Jun 1998 10:31:06 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
In a message dated 6/27/98 8:57:20 AM Central Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< When we tested the new A**** breast pump in the spring, we were given 5
 >pumps to test.  I gave 3 to moms who were renting the Elite and 2 to moms
 >who owned and were using the P*** in S****. Unfortunately, I didn't have
 >the opportunity to test the pump out with a mom who was using the Classic
 >or SMB.

 Letters and omissions are fine so long as we know what we are talking
 about.  There is discussion of both the Avent Isis pump and the
 Ameda/Hollister pump, both could be A****.  Which one are you speaking of
 in this post? And I can't identify the SMB. >>

Kathy A & Kathleen B, please refresh ALL our collective memories.  I'm having
a great deal of difficulty understanding, why, if we are discussing a product
in a professional manner, we are still using intials and ****.  While I
realize there are Medela and Ameda-Egnell and Avent and probably Ross & MJ
(which does NOT refer to the famous Michael Jordan) people on this list (hi
all of you who are lurking out there), as long as we are not speaking in an
unprofessional manner, what's the problem with calling the Avent Isis pump the
Avent Isis pump?  I'll admit this REALLY frustrates me!

Jan Barger, in Wheaton -- going ARGHHHH every time she reads one of these
posts.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2