LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Judith Hayman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:35:18 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
A question has arisen about red-tinged urine or red staining in the
first few days of life.  A number of mothers that we seen have seen this
in quote the hospital physicians or nurses as saying "This is normal.
Nothing to worry about.  It's from mom's hormones."  Now clearly a tiny
bit of blood from a baby girl would be quasi-menses.  But what about a
baby boy?

None of the references I have on my desk have any information that is
useful.  Jack Newman's book notes that red-tinged urine in the neonate
was mentioned in pre-formula medical texts as a normal variant, but a)
dismissed this as normal and b) doesn't actually explain what might be
going on.

I have done a search on the web and on PubMed already, without coming up
with anything useful.  Does anyone here have a thought?

Thanks,

Judith

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2