LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Mar 2001 00:03:18 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (52 lines)
I found this on a message board and thought some of you might be interested 
who are "groups with scanty scientific-epidemiological evidence, together 
with a most unwelcome emotional component. ". 

Barb Whitehead, IBCLC
Eastern NC


<A HREF="http://www.babymilk.com/ifm_net/news.html">IFM News</A> - Articles


Collaborative research with infant formula companies should not always be 
censored

The following is an excerpt from The British Medical Journal article by Alan 
Lucas. <A HREF="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/317/7154/333#resp5">(click here to see original)</A>
Alan Lucas, MRC clinical research professor. 
MRC Childhood Nutrition Research Centre, Institute of Child Health, London 
WC1N 1EH Companies have in the past received intense criticism over the 
marketing of infant formula in developing countries, where reduction in 
breast feeding has been associated with morbidity and shorter intervals 
between births. Despite official intervention, international codes of 
practice, national legislation, and a code drawn up by the manufacturers of 
infant formula, political debate continues. An investigation last year of 
infringements of the World Health Organisation's code in five countries 
although criticised for flawed science has further fanned the flames. 
Sponsorship remains an emotive issue. Some contend that it is wholly improper 
for clinical research, scientific meetings, or professional organisations to 
be financially assisted by formula companies. Conversely, the editor of an 
international pediatric journal, supporting sponsorship, stated: "It is quite 
extraordinary how in such a serious debate over the years, these aggressive 
attacks [on the infant formula industry] have been led by groups with scanty 
scientific-epidemiological evidence, together with a most unwelcome emotional 
component. As director of a politically "neutral" government-funded (MRC) 
Childhood Nutrition Centre, I shall attempt to steer among these polarised 
views. 
For entire article, see, The British Medical Journal article by Alan Lucas. <A HREF="http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/317/7154/333#resp5">
(click here to see original)</A>
<A HREF="http://www.babymilk.com/ifm_net/memdirect.html">Members Directory</A> | <A HREF="http://www.babymilk.com/ifm_net/library.html">IFM Library</A> | <A HREF="http://www.babymilk.com/ifm_net/news.html">IFM News</A> 
International Association of Infant Food Manufacturers
194, rue de Rivoli F-75001 PARIS
Tél: 33(0)1 53 45 87 87 Fax: 33(0)1 53 45 87 80

    
    

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2