LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jennifer Tow, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 30 Apr 2002 22:13:54 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
In a message dated 4/30/02 3:42:38 PM, [log in to unmask] writes:

<< I do not recall this being a case of a SAHM. I agree with Margery. 'Using'

BF as an excuse for mom to deny visitation rights to dad is not a positive

slant on breastfeeding in general. >>

Visitation does not mean overnights. This is an infant, not a 5 yr old. I
don't know about you, but my babies were never away from me for more than a
few hours (actually most were never away at all). It is extremely disturbing
to me that members of the bf'ing community are taking an adversarial attitude
toward the mom. I did extensive research on attacment and divorce on behalf
of a friend going through this a couple of years ago. I spoke with a number
of well-respected researchers in the field. Without exception, they said that
mothers are losing left and right in the courts and their resaerch shows that
this means babies are losing, too. None of them supported overnights for
children before the age of three.  BTW, this is a SAHM.
Jennifer Tow, IBCLC, CT, USA

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2