LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 24 Nov 1997 11:04:42 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
I think I posted on this topic a few weeks back.  I thought I would add my
.02 again since IMNSHO (in my not so humble opinion) I was under the
assumption that most solids are for "practice" and experience during the
2nd half of the first year.

Nicki Clark said:

<I think reaching for food is a sign of interest in *food*, not necessarily
a sign of interest in *eating*. And I really disagree that it is a sign of
readiness.>

Her statement and experience with her son are perfect examples.  I believe
we should let the baby take the lead.  Nicki's son was interested in what
his parents were doing and may have even enjoyed the taste, but, was not
ready for solids to replace breastmilk in any substantive way.

There are more signs to look for besides grabbing at the plate.  The lazy
mom's way of introducing foods almost guarantees that a child will be more
"ready".  What has worked for me is allowing my children to feed
themselves.  When they are interested in and ready to grab bits and get
them to their mouth, then they are ready to be INTRODUCED to solids.  By
this time (usually more like 8-10 mos, but, allow for individual variation)
they no longer tongue thrust food/stuff out of their mouths.  However, like
most things, watch what the baby does and remember that mom knows her baby
best and what will work out for her family.



Alicia, LLLL in the Bluegrass (Lexington, KY)
aka Post Poster and AS for Kentucky
mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2