LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Beverley Walker <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Sep 1997 18:45:33 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Dear Lactnetters

Yesterday's missive was not easily understood even by me?

Today's Age Melbourne

Another couple were refused entry to th e sex Exhibition Held in Melbourne
at the weekend.  this 23 year old woman with a health sex life was forced
to wheel her 5 month old baby away from the exhibition after standing in
line for a long time.

the same group of solicitors  (funny word that)  are representing this
couple as for yesterday's couple.  Yesterday's couple were breastfeeding.
Today's couple were not.

But makes an interesting legal question.  Does this mother belong to her
baby/  Does the baby belong to the mother or can they be two separate
beings?

The exhibition was for ADULTS only and that is the defence.  The
prosecution are alleging failure to be able to have equal access to goods
and services.

The Age law reporter would be happy to hear from Lactnetters

I will keep you posted.


CAN SOMEONE WRITE TO THE EDITOR OF METRO  AGE  who will run something on
the next w

ATOM RSS1 RSS2