LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrica Young <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2001 06:21:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Very moving, but is it a true statement ?  I'd love to see the
evidenced-based studies that support this emotional statement.  Logically I
don't see where it would be different from cow's milk.  Inquiring minds
want to know.  Anyone have any valid info?  Sincerely, Pat in SNJ

> And of all human food [in US and Canada], human breast milk is the most
contaminated with dioxin than any food you could >possibly choose to talk
about. And that's because it's one rung up on the food chain higher than
the foods that we adults eat. >Dioxin concentrates as it moves up the food
chain so it's distilled one more step in my body before it goes into  my
breast. So my >breast milk is ten to a hundred times more contaminated with
dioxin than is cow's milk, cheese, meat, eggs, fish,etc. which would >be
the next highest contaminated group of foods, those made from animal flesh.

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2