LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jack Newman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Feb 1997 07:47:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
I got a message from Ros Escott, who is on the advisory panel on the
marketing in Australia of infant formula chiding me for getting it
wrong on Australia.

Perhaps the writing was not clear, but I was not criticizing Australia
and suggesting it had a spineless government and the last thing I was
trying to say is that the government's attitude or Peter Hartmann's
statement were influenced by good relations with Nestle.

I was showing what could be done by a government that took
breastfeeding seriously, as, I was implying Australia's has done.  It
was the rest of our governments' which are spineless.  Ontario even
had the vice-president of Carnation (Nestle) on a commission looking
at maternal and infant health.  Not surprisingly, the word
"breastfeeding" was mentioned twice, though they went on and on about
pregnant women's nutrition (important too).

Jack Newman, MD, FRCPC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2