LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nikki Lee <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Feb 2007 09:24:19 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (131 lines)
 
Dialogue is so valuable; we all  here on LACTNET value scholarly dialogue and 
professional discourse. Dr. Karp  has answered my questions sufficiently. I 
will quote from his lengthy and informative post:
 
1) "This leads to the obvious question, won't  swaddling and white noise 
obscure the hand to mouth cues or mild fussing that  signal early hunger?  Yes, 
they will. "
 
2) "I would hope to persuade you that babies who  sleep a little more at 
night can easily get the 8-12 feeds/24 hours that are  routinely recommended by 
waking them every two hours  during the day.   Babies easily adapt to that 
schedule......."
 
3) "During the first 2 weeks of life, it is very  important for parents to be 
taught to wake their baby up out of sleep after a  few hours to make sure the 
baby is getting at least 8-12 feeds so the feeding  can be established and 
the baby does not get dehydrated"
 
 "There  is a robust body of research supporting my observations and 
recommendations  (over 50 peer reviewed references that I am happy to send to anyone 
who  wishes).  They can be divided into 3 pillars of evidence"  
".................3) The Happiest Baby video (essentially a video multiple case  study)"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------

I didn't know that DVDs were in  the hierarchy of evidence. Case studies, 
according to Greenhalgh, are the lowest  level of evidence. However they are 
valuable, and point the way to the RCTs and  such that lead to the highest level 
of evidence, the meta-analysis.
The Cochrane Collaboration lacks  any reports of THBOTB.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
 
I did a search of the Cochrane  Collaboration on swaddling.
Here's what it said:
 
Pain relief in infants:  "Neonates in the breastfeeding group had 
statistically  significantly less increase in the heart rate, reduced proportion of 
crying time  and reduced duration of crying compared to swaddled group or pacifier  
group."  
 
This review looks at breastfeeding or  human milk as a way to reduce pain in 
premature infants.
 
Treatment of opiate withdrawal in infants: "An opiate such as morphine or 
dilute tincture of opium should  probably be used as initial treatment to 
ameliorate withdrawal symptoms in  newborn infants with an opiate withdrawal due to 
maternal opiate use in  pregnancy." "Treatments for newborn infants used to 
ameliorate these symptoms  and reduce complications include opiates, sedatives 
(phenobarbitone or diazepam)  and supportive treatments (swaddling, settling, 
massage, relaxation baths,  pacifiers or waterbeds)."
 
The first choice of treatment is opiates. 
 
Developmental care for promoting  development and preventing morbidity in 
preterm infants: "Developmental  care refers to a range of strategies designed to 
reduce the stresses of the  NICU. These include reducing noise and light, 
minimal handling and giving longer  rest periods. The review of trials suggests 
that these interventions may have  some benefit to the outcomes of preterm 
infants; however, there continues to be  conflicting evidence among the multiple 
studies."
 
Cochrane Reviews meta-analysis says  that noise should be reduced for 
handling premature infants. As shushing can be  as loud as 90db, this is not 
suggested for premature  infants.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
The 4 reviews in the Cochrane  meta-analyses that include the word 
'swaddling' recommend other methods as best  to deal with infants in pain or premature 
infants.
 
My practice in lactation promotes  cue-based feeding. The evidence shows us 
that babies need to control the  rhythm of breastfeeding. (see Anderson, 
Barros, DeCarvalho, De Coopman, Daly  (several times), Goldman, Kent, Woolridge). 
The 10 Steps to Support Successful  Breastfeeding are an  evidence-based 
blueprint of how to promote and  support breastfeeding. 
 
My private practice is full of battling  dyads where the mother has been 
taught that she MUST wake the baby every 2 hours  to feed; in such cases, 
breastfeeding is on the edge of collapse. 
 
If an infant is swaddled 12-20 hours a day  from birth (as recommended in the 
book, HBOTB pp. 120-121), it will not be able  to show feeding cues. Dr. Karp 
 says this  in his lengthy post.  His suggestion is to schedule feeds to 
compensate. Neither of these practices  belong in breastfeeding.
 
 
I have already, since this lovely dialogue  started, heard of 2 cases where 
an older baby  (in one case, 2 years old)  was unable to sleep unless swaddled. 
I wonder what that means for a young life?  And what the future will hold for 
such a child.

 
I was thinking that THBOB might be good  for premature infants, that need to 
be woken on schedule because they don't show  feeding cues. But the Cochrane 
reviews don't recommend loud noises for premature  infants. Neither do a number 
of studies on babies in NICU.  So THBOTB  wouldn't be good for premature 
infants; as we are seeing more premature infants  at home these days (the result 
of in increase in inductions), it is good to know  that shushing isn't good for 
them.
 
 
Seems to me that THBOTB is the exact  opposite of what works in 
breastfeeding. While it is clearly effective for some  families, it has limited  
usefulness. It is not for all babies nor all families. Why then, is it marketed  to all?
 
It is too bad, Dr. Karp, that a person  that writes a book is at the mercy of 
one's editor. I can not understand why  baby-wearing would be removed from 
the text of your book.
 
Thank you, Dr. Karp, for answering my  questions.

 
Nikki Lee RN, MS, Mother of 2, IBCLC, CCE
Lactation Consultant,  Philadephia Department of Public Health
Maternal-Child Adjunct Faculty, Union  Institute and University
Film Reviews Editor, Journal of Human  Lactation
www.breastfeedingalwaysbest.com

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET email list is powered by LISTSERV (R).
There is only one LISTSERV. To learn more, visit:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2