LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 3 Mar 2011 18:52:11 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (71 lines)
Susan writes:

>
>
>PS.  I actually think that mothers should be able to weigh their own 
>babies.  There is evidence to suggest that you can train mothers at 
>low literacy levels to interpret growth charts appropriately.


  I don't worry about women weighing their healthy babies for fun and 
for interest, using the post office scale, the supermarket fruit 'n' 
veg scale, or their own bathroom scales, any more than I would worry 
about them choosing whether to take their babies to the hairdresser 
or cutting the baby's hair themselves or tying it up in a huge velvet 
bow.  I would like to think someone might explain that frequent 
weighing of healthy babies in these circumstances *is* for fun and 
interest only  (like hair styling)  and not a reliable way of 
assessing health or nutrition.

I'm sure it is true that low literacy women can be trained to 
interpret growth charts correctly - though I don't see funding for 
the necessary training happening any time soon anywhere :)

Here, we've had about 25 years to train health visitors to interpret 
them correctly and this is, to put it politely, still a work in 
progress.

I think, though, that  weight is *not* an isolated item of info to be 
'interpreted'. It is a *piece* of a jigsaw that goes with appearence, 
behaviour, the baby's history, birth sequelae, etc etc etc.  Weight 
is not an isolated event, either, but a series of recordable events 
over time.

>   It is akin to the arguments that used to be put forward that women 
>shouldn't have access to home pregnancy tests because they needed 
>qualified counselors or health care practitioners to help them 
>interpret the results of the test.


I never heard those arguments, but of course they are spurious.

>  I think it is CULTURE that pushes women to interpret growth in ways 
>that are not helpful.


Totally. How will encouraging and supporting frequent weighing by 
peer counsellors and mothers reduce the impact of this, when so many 
HCPs interpret weight so poorly, too?

Again, while agreeing that culture can be changed, I don't see the 
fixation on weight (in the West? With the obsession with weight that 
*all* women are aware of, throughout their lives?) disappearing soon.

Heather Welford Neil
NCT bfc, tutor, UK
-- 
http://www.heatherwelford.co.uk

http://heatherwelford.posterous.com

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2