LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Karen Gromada <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 May 2005 02:46:56 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Re: << Yesterday I saw a mom and her preemie twins. The babies were born at 34 week and are now three weeks old and both still under 5lb. They seem to be nursing well and gaining slowly. Mom has sore nipples, and says that they babies nurse almost non-stop. I checked positioning and we worked on latch a bit. The funny thing is, one of the babies has a very tight frenulum. The other's oral anatomy is just fine. It's the one that does NOT have the tight frenulum that hurts mom when he nurses. I think that we got that pretty well worked out by correcting positioning.

What I am wondering about is this; could having a tight frenulum, even with
good nursing, no nipple trauma or pain, lead to the baby not having his
sucking needs satisfied? This baby needs to suck almost all the time. He
nurses till he falls asleep. Sleeps for about 5 to 10 minutes and wants to
nurse again. When he is not nursing he is rooting. He has plenty of wet
and poopy diapers. Any thoughts on this? >>


I would think that their gestational age could have as much or more to do with these babies' ability to suck effectively as a frenulum issue. Most 34 weekers cannot sustain suckling long enough to effectively remove milk in adequate amounts for good weight gain. At 3 weeks, these babies are still only 37 weekers and babies at this gestational age are often still having problems sustaining suck. I don't think it's about them meeting sucking needs; sounds as if it's all about getting enough food. They've been "asked" to do a job their CNS and mouths usually wouldn't be ready to do yet. I'm surprised that they've done as well as they have but am not surprised they've been constantly BF, which is a red flag for ineffective BF -- as are mother's sore nipples.

Personally, I wonder if it's in the babies' best physical interests or the mother's emotional interest to be BF as much as described. Within an individual feeding, sucking becomes less organized/effective over time, and the most effective sucking is done within the first 10 minutes or so. If looooooong feedings get less organized, what are they accomplishing vs. what kind of energy expenditure is going into each baby being able to get enough food at this point? 

Karen G

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2