LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Judy Ritchie <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Dec 2007 12:18:40 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (102 lines)
Editorial whether government programs should take money from Nutricia,
Nestle and other formula companies.
Judy

http://www.nutraingredients.com/news/ng.asp?n=81940&m=1NIED10&c=ymhgzhkpfeeb
tvm

Weekly Comment
Infant nutrition: Too close for comfort?
10/12/2007 - Industry has to walk a tightrope between lending a benevolent
hand to support infant nutrition for the good of public health, and cynical
marketing that seems to cash in on sensitivities.

The market for formula milk is worth some ˆ597m and formula manufacturers
have been adding extra nutritional benefits like omega-3 and probiotics to
make the product closer to the nutrient profile of breast milk. 

Quite rightly the World Health Organisation has rules in place to stop the
promotion of infant formula at the cost of breast milk. But this is a very
simplistic view of the complex world of marketing. 

Last week formula firm Nutricia handed over a "substantial donation" to the
child obesity group Mend in the UK to help improve the health of toddlers
and boost infant diet by educating parents.

Owned by Royal Numico, the firm was criticised by breastfeeding lobbyists
for being too involved. 

Nutricia said public health policies largely neglected toddler nutrition. If
this is the case, then private money is a vital part of the jigsaw. But it
also raises the question: can government's worldwide do more?

Possibly one of the longest running boycotts of a food company has been
organised by lobbyists against Nestle, and to this day still rages. The
Nestle boycott was sparked by concerns over the Swiss firm's marketing
practices of infant formula in less economically developed countries.

As soon as companies become involved with charities, social enterprise and
handing money to hospitals, it is only human nature that alarm bells begin
ringing. 

We should be careful about jumping to conclusions. 

Private money could be vital and some of these firms - such as Nestle - have
plenty of cash. 

If that money is used to help children lead a better, healthier life, and
plug gaps in national health services, then all the better. On the other
hand, if that is at the expense of a cheap marketing trick then the line has
been crossed. 

But at what point is too much industry involvement?

Lobbyists would say we are already at that point. Industry would beg to
differ. 

There is a need for a transparent system of checks and balances. If industry
wants to avoid unnecessary criticism, it could offer its own system of
checks and balances. The question is, who should this come from?

And if companies really want to keep some distance they could contribute to
a fund which is administered by an independent group. 

For now, it seems the gauntlet has been left for watchdog groups, including
Baby Milk Action and International Baby Food Action Network (IBFAN), to pick
up and keep a close eye on companies' marketing tactics. 

A report by IBFAN listed some 3,000 violations by a dozen infant nutrition
companies allegedly breaking rules on marketing. 

Nestle, Heinz and Numico were all featured in the report - but denied they
had done anything wrong. 

The world's largest food company was blasted for "branding" babies at birth
in some Chinese hospitals with wrist bands with the Nestle name and logo on.

Nestle said that under the WHO code they were allowed to donate equipment
and materials to healthcare systems "with a company's name and logo - but
not with a formula product name or brand."

Should the day come when industry is wrapped on the knuckles and regulation
outlaws any involvement, then parents, industry and infants could all find
themselves the losers. 

And if it does we will be left asking: who is really thinking of the
children?

Alex McNally is a senior reporter with NutraIngredients.com and has lived
and worked in France, Brussels and the UK. If you would like to comment on
the piece, send an email to: [log in to unmask]

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2