LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Judy Holtzer Knopf <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 4 Aug 1995 16:15:19 -0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
On Fri, 4 Aug 1995, R LOCKYER wrote:

> I agree with your frustrations. I've had similar discussions w/ people in
> all areas of health care. As an LC, you probably have the best opportunity
> to address the issue. Question is how far into bed does one have to crawl
> in order to accurately research and clarify what seems obvious? I've
> observed otherwise rational and caring individuals compromising themselves
> in the name of research.

Ummmm, not sure if I follow you. My frustrations (at least, those
presently under discussion....) deal with, say, showing some OB some study
that "showed" that c/s epidurals may cause disorganized suck. The OB can
claim, and most correctly, that it was the lack of stimulation provided
by a vaginal birth that "caused" the disorganized suck. Go prove the OB
wrong!
What did *you* mean by compromising themselves in the name of research?
Judy K. in Israel. Who and where are you?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2