LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 4 Dec 2010 17:36:36 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (62 lines)
I appreciate the responses to my question 'why test the fat content 
of breastmilk' but I *still*  don't get it!

In the UK, women do sometimes hear from people who should know better 
that there may be something lacking in their milk,  but I have never 
heard of anyone being asked for a sample to measure it for fat (maybe 
the machines don't exist here).  So I am somewhat of an outsider 
commenting on it, I accept.

So it seems to me that testing would be to show the doctor that there 
is indeed sufficient fat in it - based on some (probably) spurious 
idea that the energy value of human milk is  an 'average' of 20 kCal 
per ounce...but while this might shut the doctor up a bit, it doesn't 
really *educate* him or her.

In fact, it confirms that this is indeed something so important to 
know, that the mother can have her milk assessed. "Thank you, doctor, 
a good question to ask, and yes, of course this mother's milk should 
be tested, and here are the results!"

In any case,  fat is only one part of the milk that ensures growth in 
the bf infant.

What about protein? A brief literature search showed me that protein 
is the 'worrisomely variable element of breastmilk' du jour with 
several papers testing and comparing and wondering (mainly for 
pre-term infants, who I accept have different needs).

So satisfying the doctor that Ms X's breastmilk has more than 20 kCal 
per ounce and is therefore adequate will not satisfy the really 
determined doctor who can then say 'aha! But what about its protein 
content?'

Moreover, really, it's VOLUME of breastmilk that drives growth, isn't 
it? So even if you had some weak 'n' watery, low protein, low fat 
sample, if the baby drank enough of it, that wouldn't be a problem.

Doctors need to know this, and who better than the bf specialist to tell them?

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15693858 is a study whose abstract 
at least is interesting - shows that different ways of assessing 
content of breastmilk give different results (and their figures show 
a variability between samples, anyway).

Heather Welford Neil
CT bfc, tutor, UK
-- 
http://www.heatherwelford.co.uk

http://heatherwelford.posterous.com

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2