>
>Please note the "AT LEAST NOT USUALLY" part of my original riposte.

Kathy, please understand I am not 'jumping all over you'. I am just firmly
of the belief that due to many of the cultural issues you research and talk
about we have lost or perhaps never gained (?) the understanding that the
percentage of men with measurable amounts of glandular tissue is within the
range that I would consider 'normal'. If, as I understand it, the female
body is the pattern and the male the derived wouldn't this make sense? I am
not in any way suggesting males are able to feed their young.

I, too have the article about the starving men developing milk. It was
published in Australia and discussed a couple of years ago on Lactnet, so
should be in the archives. It is my understanding that it was a function of
the prolonged starvation.

Regards Rhoda

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html