LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Diane Wiessinger <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 20 Aug 1998 02:23:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
I just read this in Time Magazine, from the Yale Child Study Center:

"Tell a 7 or 8 year old, 'Johnny broke one teacup throwing it at his
sister.  Sara broke eight teacups helping Dad load the dishwasher.  Which
kid did the worse thing?'  The average 7-year-old will pick Sara because
she broke more.  By 11, they have it sorted out that intentionality is part
of the moral system.  Not when you're seven."

I don't *think* my kids would have answered that way at age 7.  If you want
to ask your kids and e-mail me privately with age and answer, I'd be really
curious to see what you find.

One of mine asked me, 10 years ago at age 6, what the police would do to
him if he killed someone.  "They wouldn't do anything to you, because
they'd figure you were too young to know the difference between right and
wrong."  "But *I know* the difference between right and wrong!"  "I know
you know, but *they* wouldn't think you did."  And I did indeed feel
certain that he had a very clear moral sense at age 6.  Interesting
conversation, in light of our recent rash of violent crimes by the very
young, but I can't back up and pose this scenario to him.

Diane Wiessinger, Ithaca, NY

ATOM RSS1 RSS2